Stop The LB Madnesses

What you're proposing is actually unfair.

 

This screams of "easy exploitation", lol...

 

I have an idea.

Let’s say to earn 1 star you need 30, 2 star needs 65, 3 star needs 100.

Let’s create a new tier of, let’s say, 200.

For the first 10 who reach 200 they get 1st place, the next 10 get 2nd, so on and so forth. This is very simple and rewards those who are first to end the quest.

This would then reward those who are more active instead of those who have more money.

 

how could I admit opposite of what I said?

 

Ties on event leaderboards are something our team is aware of and looking into in terms of impact and options we have to better handle this kind of event system.

 

How is it unfair if everyone can have an equal chance of achieving first ? You'e asking for it to be more difficult. People who spend will just spend more to keep people such as yourself from getting first.


We need more solo events.

 

Even if you have the 2nd highest points total, if 5 people have the same amount more than you it means you are 6th overall. This is entirely fair. If people use this mathematical fact to there advantage they are simply playing that game, nothing unfair in that.
the reason top clans are always at the top of LB is that the way they become top clan is by being very active and so it only makes sense that they are always at top of LBs.
Also, when you get multiple ties it tends to be on quests where people are likely to get same points e.g. Monster slaying, where anyone who has hit the same number of the same level monsters the same number of time will all have the same points. Doesn't tend to happen on research, contruction, troop training or might growth.
Splitting as you suggest would be more unfair. Imagine 5 people joint first splitting prize with 1 person in second on own. Person in second would end up with better reward than all those above them.
Only fair way I can see to split ties would be to have time achieved as a tie-breaker I.e. Someone getting 100k points after 30 mins would beat someone who got there in 50 mins. Either that, or split on might with lower might getting preference I.e. Someone with 20mil might would beat someone with 40mil might with same points.

 

if 12 ppl harvest 120k rss 12 ppl join 1st place. i have 80k 12 ppl have more than me I'm 13th. i hear you what you saying. you're frustrated. you don't sends to have a chance to win. competition is too big. what may help is categories (e.g. weight category in boxing) based, and I propose town hall level (rather than might as some may suggest)

 

Your idea is completely unfair. If three of us tie for 1st place and you are in fourth place you didn't earn a reward beyond 4th place. You just want to penalize good players. The stars are your participation trophies beyond that if you want top 3 you have to earn it.

 

Time as a remedy is not a good idea either. Time zones complicate the matter when to be on when a quest starts and money will always make it easier to get there first.