Name:

Verification:

Enter the words or numbers from the box above:

Reload or listen to audio. By reCAPTCHA™

Reload or go back to text. By reCAPTCHA™

reCAPTCHA verification is loading. Please refresh the page if it does not load.

Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Ahnialator6, post: 1848, member: 1655963056&quot;]As it stands, the hiring of allies is great, but i believe it is clunky, unforgiving(especially to new players) and, there is not much to go off of. The hiring pool is full of players, both active and not. Whenever a player is hired, his cost increases, because hes more desirable, which is all well and good, but the whole system is designed to generate gold, and it does so....poorly. Less experienced players will be more likely to hire random players, cluttering up higher tiers with a trashy 0%bonus. And thats fine too, it helps people to make the connection of what is worth what. </p><p><br /></p><p>I believe the system would be more intuitive for newer players, and, make the system better at its job of gold generatuon if cost-to-hire diminishes over time(AND return on investment), after a large period of not being hired. Not only will this give players better control over the market, it will be both incentive to grow, and a better learning experience. I believe this change will also make the market more competitive, as active growing allies make better allies than stagnant inactives[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Password:

Forgot your password?

Stay logged in