Menu
Home
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Recent Posts
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Website
Store
Menu
Log in
Sign up
Kingdoms of Heckfire Forums
Home
Forums
Kingdoms of Heckfire
Feedback
Royal Knights injured faster than non-defensive troops?
Welcome to the Kingdoms of Heckfire Forums Guest!
Please review our
Code of Conduct
before posting.
Dismiss Notice
Reply to Thread
Name:
Verification:
Enter the words or numbers from the box above:
Reload
or
listen to audio
. By reCAPTCHA™
Reload
or
go back to text
. By reCAPTCHA™
reCAPTCHA verification is loading. Please refresh the page if it does not load.
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dlz9345X, post: 7623, member: 1521694807"]While I know my explanation is definetely too simple and yours is probably correct, in my tests, I simply attacked just barely enough to win (basically same attack as defense; edits for more clarity on original post). I as well tested it after (attack with much higher strength) and those numbers are not the caps of losses. I as well removed my dragons from wall, but I didn’t sell allies or factor research into account.</p><p><br /></p><p>In my tests, I believe loss is scaled based on enemy strength in the attack, plus the other factors you described.</p><p><br /></p><p>And for Multiplat, I don’t know exactly what tests you used, but I am assuming that what you did was attack 800k royal knights (let’s say 150 mil def) with 150mil attack and 800k trophy huntress (let’s say 50 mil def) with 50 mil def. if you didn’t, then please let us know and with more detail about your experiment. </p><p><br /></p><p>What I am proposing towards your concern is that knights do not injure faster than huntresses/pugs. Instead, you are just being attacking the knights with more force, which means that more knights should in turn be injured more.</p><p><br /></p><p>Another test:</p><p>50k huntress (3mil def) Vs. 3mil attack: 1148 injured</p><p>50k knights (9mil def) Vs. 3 mil attack: 1142 injured[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dlz9345X, post: 7623, member: 1521694807"]While I know my explanation is definetely too simple and yours is probably correct, in my tests, I simply attacked just barely enough to win (basically same attack as defense; edits for more clarity on original post). I as well tested it after (attack with much higher strength) and those numbers are not the caps of losses. I as well removed my dragons from wall, but I didn’t sell allies or factor research into account. In my tests, I believe loss is scaled based on enemy strength in the attack, plus the other factors you described. And for Multiplat, I don’t know exactly what tests you used, but I am assuming that what you did was attack 800k royal knights (let’s say 150 mil def) with 150mil attack and 800k trophy huntress (let’s say 50 mil def) with 50 mil def. if you didn’t, then please let us know and with more detail about your experiment. What I am proposing towards your concern is that knights do not injure faster than huntresses/pugs. Instead, you are just being attacking the knights with more force, which means that more knights should in turn be injured more. Another test: 50k huntress (3mil def) Vs. 3mil attack: 1148 injured 50k knights (9mil def) Vs. 3 mil attack: 1142 injured[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Kingdoms of Heckfire Forums
Home
Forums
Kingdoms of Heckfire
Feedback
Royal Knights injured faster than non-defensive troops?
Kingdoms of Heckfire Forums
Home
Forums
Kingdoms of Heckfire
Feedback
Royal Knights injured faster than non-defensive troops?